2017-01-02 11:48 GMT+01:00 Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr>: > > Hello Pavel, > > In my proposal was support for transaction scope - ON COMMIT RESET clause >> should be ok >> > > Could you update the wiki, both the proposal and the use-case > implementation, to reflect this point? > > Moreover, is there any actual use-case for non-transactional secure > half-persistent session variables? AFAICS the "secure" part implies both > permissions and transactional for the presented security-related use case. > If there is no use case for these combined features, then ISTM that you > should update to proposal so that the variables are always transactional, > which is both simpler, more consistent, and I think more acceptable. >
If you are transaction sensitive, then you have to be sensitive to subtransactions - then the work is much more complex. Is there use case, when you would to play with transactions and variables and RESET is not enough? > > Also, you used a TEMPORARY session variable in one implementation, but > this is not described in the proposal, I think it is worth mentioning it > there as well. I will fix it. Regards Pavel > > > -- > Fabien. >
