Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> writes: > The recent thread about compiler warnings got me thinking about how it's > essentially impossible to notice warnings with default make output. > Perhaps everyone just uses make -s by default, though that's a bit > annoying since you get no output unless something does warn (and then > you don't know what directory it was in).
> Is it worth looking into this? I'm guessing this may be moot with the > CMake work, but it's not clear when that'll make it in. In the meantime, > ISTM http://stackoverflow.com/a/218295 should be an easy change to make > (though perhaps with a variable that gives you the old behavior). I'm not really sure which of the kluges in that article you're proposing we adopt, but none of them look better than "make -s" to me. Also, none of them would do anything about make's own verbosity such as "entering/leaving directory" lines. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
