On 3 January 2017 at 15:50, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Simon Riggs <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Trying to fit recovery targets into one parameter was really not
>> feasible, though I tried.
>
> What was the problem?

There are 5 different parameters that affect the recovery target, 3 of
which are optional. That is much more complex than the two compulsory
parameters suggested when the proposal was made and in my view tips
the balance over the edge into pointlessness. Michael's suggestion for
2 parameters works well for this case.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to