On 3 January 2017 at 23:22, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> I don't see why that would be unacceptable. If we do it for >> remote_apply, why not also do it for other modes? Whatever the >> reasoning was for remote_apply should work for other modes. I should >> add it was originally designed to be that way by me, so must have been >> changed later. > > You can achieve that with this patch by setting > replication_lag_sample_interval to 0. I wonder why you ignore my mention of the bug in the correct mechanism? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
