Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 12:12, Tom Lane wrote: >> (No problem here with adding the noise-word option, of course.)
> Note that it won't be a noise word: if NO SCROLL is specified, an > attempt to do a backward fetch on a non-scrollable cursor will yield an > error. Hm. We could imagine a three-way option: NO SCROLL always error if fetch backwards <nothing> allow if plan supports it SCROLL allow, add overhead if needed to support The <nothing> case would deviate from the spec but would give backwards compatibility. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly