On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think it would be a good idea to lock all the people who really care > about PL/pgsql in a room until they agree on what changes should be > made for the next version of the language. If they don't agree > quickly enough, we can resort to the techniques described in > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_election,_1268%E2%80%9371
I think that's a very good idea, and I'm happy to be locked into such a room. I think such a discussion will be very fruitful, given the others in the room have also already decided they want a new language and are there to discuss "the next version of the language", instead of debating why they don't think we need a new language. It would also be good if those people could bring laptops with all their plpgsql code bases, to check if any of the proposed possibly non-backwards compatible syntax proposals would break nothing, just a few functions, or a lot of functions in their code bases. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
