2017-01-08 3:31 GMT+01:00 Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com>: > On 1/7/17 5:39 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > >> >> I checked current implementation of FOUND variable. If we introduce new >> auto variable ROW_COUNT - exactly like FOUND, then it doesn't introduce >> any compatibility break. >> > > Except it would break every piece of code that had a row_count variable, > though I guess you could see which scoping level the variable had been > defined in. > > I think the right solution in this case is to replace GET DIAGNOSTICs with > something easier to use, but I'm not sure what that would be. >
I invite any ideas? Regards Pavel > > I think this is another example of where not using some kind of character > to distinguish variables screws us. :/ > -- > Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX > Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL > Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com > 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) >
