David Fetter wrote:
> + if (query->commandType == CMD_UPDATE || query->commandType ==
> CMD_DELETE)
> + {
> + /* Make sure there's something to look at. */
> + Assert(query->jointree != NULL);
> + if (query->jointree->quals == NULL)
> + ereport(ERROR,
> + (errcode(ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR),
> + errmsg("%s requires a WHERE clause
> when the require_where hook is enabled.",
> + query->commandType ==
> CMD_UPDATE ? "UPDATE" : "DELETE"),
> + errhint("To %s all rows, use \"WHERE
> true\" or similar.",
> + query->commandType ==
> CMD_UPDATE ? "update" : "delete")));
> + }
Per my earlier comment, I think this should use
ERRCODE_S_R_E_PROHIBITED_SQL_STATEMENT_ATTEMPTED instead.
I think this should say "the \"require_hook\" extension" rather than
use the term "hook".
(There are two or three translatability rules violations in this
snippet, but since this is an extension and those are not translatable,
I won't say elaborate further.)
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
