On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 1/9/17 7:44 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> So based on that, I suggest we go ahead and make the change to make both >> the values 10 by default. And that we do that now, because that lets us >> get it out through more testing on different platforms, so that we catch >> issues earlier on if they do arise. > > Sounds good.
I may be outvoted, but I'm still not in favor of changing the default wal_level. That caters only to people who lack sufficient foresight to know that they need a replica before the system becomes so critical that they can't bounce it to update the configuration. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
