On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 08:28:28AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > On 01/10/2017 09:25 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >I am not saying we shouldn't do it, but I am afraid that the complexity > >in figuring out when to use indirect indexes, combined with the number > >of users who will try them, really hurts its inclusion. > > > > > I think you're making this out to be far more complex than it really is. You > could argue the same about a great many features. Both of these features > have upsides and downsides.
Right, and we do make such arguments --- what is your point? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
