On 1/11/17 11:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> There are approximately 11 copies of atooid() and 3 of oid_cmp() or >> equivalent, and pending patches are proposing to add more. I propose >> these two patches to collect them in central places. > > +1 for the concept, but I'm a bit worried about putting atooid() in > postgres_ext.h. That's going to impose on the namespace of libpq-using > applications, for instance. A more conservative answer would be to > add it to c.h. OTOH, postgres_ext.h is where the Oid typedef lives, > so I do see the consistency of adding this there. Hard choice.
How about two copies: one in postgres_fe.h and one in postgres.h? > The oid_cmp() move looks fine if we only need it on the server side. > But doesn't pg_dump have one too? The pg_dump one isn't a qsort comparator, though. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
