On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Peter Eisentraut
> > <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> This patch looks reasonable to me.
> >>
> >> Attached is a top-up patch with a few small fixups.
> >>
> >> I suggest to wait for the resolution of the "Replication/backup
> >> defaults" thread.  I would not want to be in a situation where users who
> >> have not been trained to use replication slots now have yet another
> >> restart-only parameter to set before they can take a backup.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for the review and the top-up patch. I've applied it and pushed.
>
> - if (replication_slot && includewal != STREAM_WAL)
> + if ((replication_slot || no_slot) && includewal != STREAM_WAL)
>
> Why do we need to check "no_slot" here? Since no_slot=true means that
> no temporary replication slot is specified, it's fine even with both -X
> none
> and fetch.
>

Um yeah, that looks like a bad merge actually. Will fix.

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

Reply via email to