On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looking at this patch, I am not sure that it is worth worrying about. > This is a receipt to make back-patching a bit more complicated, and it > makes the code more complicated to understand. So I would vote for > rejecting it and move on.
I have done so for now to make the CF move, if somebody wants to complain feel free... -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
