On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Karl O. Pinc <k...@meme.com> wrote: > Maybe. It's not user-supplied data that's corrupted but it is > PG generated data which is generated for and supplied to the user. > I just looked at all uses of XX001 and it is true that they all > involve corruption of user-supplied data. > > If you don't want to use XX001 use XX000. It does not seem worth > making a new error code for just this one case.
Our ideas rather map here, ERRCODE_INTERNAL_ERROR would be adapted for this situation. Do any of you want to give it a shot or should I? -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
