On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 4:11 AM, Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: > >> After sleeping on this, I'm inclined to go with Amit's fix for now. >> It seems less likely to break anything in the back-branches than any >> other option I can think up. > > Yeah, no objections here.
+1. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
