On 1/23/17 6:55 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Jim Nasby (jim.na...@bluetreble.com) wrote:
As others have mentioned, right now practically no one enables this,
so we've got zero data on how useful it might actually be.
Uhm, Peter G just said that Heroku enables this on all their databases
and have yet to see a false-positive report or an issue with having it
enabled.
That, plus the reports and evidence we've seen in the past couple days,
look like a pretty ringing endorsement for having them.
I'll ping the RDS crowd and see if they'll tell me what they're doing
and what their thoughts are on it.
Oh, I read the thread as "there's no data to support checksums are
useful", not "there's no data to support there's little risk of bugs or
false-positives". I certainly agree that Heroku is a good test of both
of those.
IIRC Grant's mentioned in one of his presentations that they enable
checksums, but getting more explicit info would be good.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
