2017-01-23 21:59 GMT+01:00 Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com>: > On 1/23/17 2:10 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > >> Comments, notes? >> > > +1 on the idea. It'd also be nice if we could expose control of plans for > dynamic SQL, though I suspect that's not terribly useful without some kind > of global session storage. >
yes - it requires classic normalised query string controlled plan cache. But same plan cache options can be valid for prepared statements - probably with GUC. This is valid theme, but out of my proposal in this moment. Regards Pavel
