On 2017-01-24 15:50:47 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > I am marking this patch as "returned with feedback". That's quite a > heavy change and it looks to be too late in the development cycle of > PG10 to consider it. Peter's commit bits, who is also the reviewer, > are beginning to smoke as well after everything that has happened for > the logical replication changes.
I'm doubtful about this being ready in time too, but it seems a might heavyhanded to make that call on your own. Including the judgement about Peter's capability to handle more. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
