On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:10 PM, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:23:23PM -0500, Corey Huinker wrote: > > > > Feel free to mark it returned as feedback. The concept didn't > > generate as much enthusiasm as I had hoped, so I think the right > > thing to do now is scale it back to a patch that makes > > CopyFromRawFields() externally visible so that extensions can use > > them. > > You're getting enthusiasm in the form of these reviews and suggestions > for improvement. That it doesn't always happen immediately is a > byproduct of the scarcity of developer time and the sheer volume of > things to which people need to pay attention. True about that. I was referring to "ooh! I need that!"-type interest. I'll proceed, keeping in mind that there's a fallback position of just making some of the guts of COPY available to be called by extensions like was done for file_fdw.
