2017-01-28 17:09 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes: > > Now EXPLAIN ANALYZE produce too wide rows for usage in presentations > > > What do you think about possibility to implement >>optional<< alternative > > formatting. > > Now: > > node name (estimation) (actual) > > Alternative: > > node name (estimation) > > (actual) > > Seems like that would make a difference in only a tiny minority of > situations. In a deeply nested plan you'll have trouble no matter > what, and it's not uncommon that the node name line isn't the widest > thing anyway. >
It is related to presentation where you have to use large type - and where usually don't present complex nested plans, or you present only fragments. A output of EXPLAIN is usually ok - EXPLAIN ANALYZE does a overflow This feature is in nice to have category - probably interesting for lectures or presenters only - can helps and doesn't need lot of work. So I am ask for community opinion. The result should not be exactly how I proposed - any form what is more friendly for tiny monitor (projectors) is welcome Regards Pavel > > regards, tom lane >
