On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> "txn" can be used for abbreviation of "Transaction", so for example >> pg_fdw_txn_resolver? >> I'm also fine to change the module and function name. > > If we're judging the relative clarity of various ways of abbreviating > the word "transaction", "txn" surely beats "x". > > To repeat my usual refrain, is there any merit to abbreviating at all? > Could we call it, say, "fdw_transaction_resolver" or > "fdw_transaction_manager"? >
Almost modules in contrib are name with "pg_" prefix but I prefer "fdw_transcation_resolver" if we don't need "pg_" prefix. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
