2017-02-06 21:36 GMT+01:00 Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr>: > > Hello, > > I'll work on my proposal in v11 time. Maybe in this time Postgres will >> support autonomous transactions. >> > > Maybe. > > The variables syntax should be better integrated to core - it should be >> implemented without getter/setter functions. >> > > Yes, a nicer syntax would be great. > > Note that setter/getter could be useful for some use case, eg with queries > built dynamically?
There is not any problem for usage in dynamic sql. Some generic access is done already. > > > I am not sure If statement SET can be enhanced to allows the work with >> session variables without some conflicts, but we will see. >> > > If so, maybe some kind of prefix could provide a workaround. any other database objects has not prefix. But we can identify a ambiguous situation and in this case we can require qualified identifier. Regards Pavel > > > -- > Fabien. >
