* Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> * Rushabh Lathia (rushabh.lat...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Commit c59a1a89035674c6efacc596d652528cebba37ec don't allow non-positive
> > number
> > of jobs. Now on 9.2 number of jobs get assigned to opts->number_of_jobs. If
> > user don't specify any value -j then default value will be always 0. Which
> > will
> > lead to the "invalid number of parallel jobs" error.
> >
> > if (opts->number_of_jobs <= 0)
> > {
> > fprintf(stderr, _("%s: invalid number of parallel jobs\n"),
> > progname);
> > exit(1);
> > }
> >
> > Please find attach patch to initialize default value for number of jobs to
> > 1.
>
> Ugh. This is what I get for thinking that our regression tests actually
> test even the basic things.
>
> That fix should go into NewRestoreOptions() where the other not-zero
> settings go.
>
> I'll fix it here in a few.Fix pushed. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
