> On Feb 7, 2017, at 6:40 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> 
> Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>> 
>>> On Feb 7, 2017, at 4:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Thanks for the clarification.  I have updated the recipe along with Emre’s 
>>>> comments here:
>>>> 
>>>> [updated text not included in the email]
>>> 
>>> I still don't think the recipe is a very good one because it leaves you
>>> with a window where the affected columns are not indexed at all.
>> 
>> Okay, so I propose two options:
>> 
>>      1.  Does anyone have a recipe they recommend that might be better? OR
> 
> Do the CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY first, then DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY the
> old index, then rename the new index to the old name.

Cool.  Updated:

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=press.git;a=blob;f=update_releases/current/20170209updaterelease.txt;h=56551b56eb1f70e734c5762abf5ddf6bd6965fdb;hb=c1b7f9c0cfd0ff106409d14a36c3122a8ee460d0
 
<https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=press.git;a=blob;f=update_releases/current/20170209updaterelease.txt;h=56551b56eb1f70e734c5762abf5ddf6bd6965fdb;hb=c1b7f9c0cfd0ff106409d14a36c3122a8ee460d0>

I added a note to alert people to disk space usage utilizing this method.

Thanks for the help!

Jonathan.

Reply via email to