On 2/9/17 2:14 PM, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us > <mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>>wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com <mailto:robertmh...@gmail.com>> > writes: > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net > <mailto:mag...@hagander.net>> wrote: > >>> Here is what I have, 6 votes clearly stated: > >>> 1. Rename nothing: Daniel, > >>> 2. Rename directory only: Andres > >>> 3. Rename everything: Stephen, Vladimir, David S, Michael P (with > >>> aliases for functions, I could live without at this point...) > > > [ vote-counting ] > > > Therefore, I plan to go ahead and do #3. Somebody's probably going to > > jump in now with another opinion but I think this thread's gone on > > long enough. > > Agreed, let's just get it done. > > Although this doesn't really settle whether we ought to do 3a (with > backwards-compatibility function aliases in core) or 3b (without 'em). > Do people want to re-vote, understanding that those are the remaining > choices?
-1 on aliases in core (so to be clear my vote is for 3b). > I wouldn't oppose: > > CREATE EXTENSION give_me_my_xlog_back; > > but my prior thoughts lead me toward not including such functions in the > bootstrap catalog. I'm not very excited about an extension, can we just provide a link to a script in the release notes, or simply note that wrappers can be created? -- -David da...@pgmasters.net -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
