On 2017-02-09 19:19:21 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > Also, our experience with contrib/tsearch2 suggests that the extension > > > shouldn't be part of contrib, because we have zero track record of getting > > > rid of stuff in contrib, no matter how dead it is. > > > > Let's nuke tsearch2 to remove this adverse precedent, and then add the > > new thing. > > > > Anybody who still wants tsearch2 can go get it from an old version, or > > somebody can maintain a fork on github. > > Works for me.
+1 > I'd love to nuke pg_shadow and all the other > not-really-maintained backwards-compat things from when roles were > added too. Not sure if it's worth the work to rip out and such, but I'm mildly supportive of this one too. Depends a bit on what all the other things are ;) Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
