On 02/10/2017 06:41 AM, David Steele wrote: > On 2/10/17 6:28 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >>> On 2017-02-09 19:19:21 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: >>>> * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>>>>> Also, our experience with contrib/tsearch2 suggests that the extension >>>>>> shouldn't be part of contrib, because we have zero track record of >>>>>> getting >>>>>> rid of stuff in contrib, no matter how dead it is. >>>>> >>>>> Let's nuke tsearch2 to remove this adverse precedent, and then add the >>>>> new thing. >>>>> >>>>> Anybody who still wants tsearch2 can go get it from an old version, or >>>>> somebody can maintain a fork on github. >>>> >>>> Works for me. >>> >>> +1 >> >> OK, that's three votes in favor of removing tsearch2 (from core, >> anyone who wants it can maintain a copy elsewhere). Starting a new >> thread to make sure we collect all the relevant votes, but I really, >> really think it's past time for this to go away. The last actual >> change to tsearch2 which wasn't part of a wider cleanup was >> 3ca7eddbb7c4803729d385a0c9535d8a972ee03f in January 2009, so it's been >> 7 years since there's been any real work done on this -- and the >> release where we brought tsearch into core is now EOL, plus three more >> releases besides. > > +1 >
+1 -- Josh Berkus Containers & Databases Oh My! -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
