On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote:
> On 02/10/2017 08:27 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> For me a killer feature would be if/when we can get to a point where we >> can >> have something pgxs-style on cmake that also works on windows. >> >> Our homemade Windows build system works OK for postgres, and while ugly it >> is as you say well tested by now. But it doesn't do *anything* to help >> people build extensions on Windows. >> > > Do we need to build PostgreSQL itself using cmake, to achieve that? Could > we write something like pgxs for cmake, only for extensions? > > I guess we wouldn't, but we'd still need the "replacement for autoconf" part. So then we're back to maintaining multiple buildsystems. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
