Robert Haas wrote: > My big objection to removing these views is that it will break pgAdmin > 3, which uses all three of these views. I understand that the pgAdmin > community is now moving away from pgAdmin 3 and toward pgAdmin 4, but > I bet that pgAdmin 3 still has significant usage and will continue to > have significant usage for at least a year or three. When it's > thoroughly dead, then I think we can go ahead and do this, unless > there are other really important tools still depending on those views, > but it's only been 3 months since the final pgAdmin 3 release.
Well, we can remove them from PG10 and pgAdmin3 (and others) be adjusted to use the new ones, conditionally on server version. Surely pgAdmin3 is going to receive further updates, given that it's still widely used? > IMHO, these views aren't costing us much. It'd be nice to get rid of > them eventually but a view definition doesn't really need much > maintenance. Maybe not, but the fact that they convey misleading information is bad. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
