On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> FWIW, my own habit when creating new PG files is generally to write >> >> * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2017, PostgreSQL Global Development Group >> * Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California >> >> even if it's "all new" code. The main reason being that it's hardly ever >> the case that you didn't copy-and-paste some amount of stuff out of a >> pre-existing file, and trying to sort out how much of what originated >> exactly when is an unrewarding exercise. Even if it is basically all >> new code, this feels like giving an appropriate amount of credit to >> Those Who Went Before Us. > > Right. I tend to do the same, and wonder if we shouldn't make that a > general practice.
This looks sensible to me. No-brainer rules that make sense are less things to worry about. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
