On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I thought people would object to checking the version number in two >> different places to make the same fundamental decision, and would want that >> refactored somehow. But if you are OK with it, then I am. > > The binary versions are checked only once, which does not with change > HEAD. With this patch it happens just earlier, which makes the most > sense now that we have a condition depending on the version of what is > installed.
Thanks, Michael! Committed. I actually thought about this problem when I committed the original patch but decided it ought to be OK because I didn't see why we'd be running pg_resetxlog on the old cluster. I didn't think about the fact that we might be running it with the -n option. Oops. Thanks Jeff for the report. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
