On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On 2017/02/21 12:10, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: >> I think, that's a limitation till we implement global indexes. But >> nothing in the current implementation stops us from implementing it. >> In fact, I remember, a reply from Robert to another thread on >> partitioning started in parallel to Amit's thread had explained some >> of these design decisions. I am unable to find link to that exact >> reply though. > > Are you perhaps thinking of the message titled "design for a partitioning > feature (was: inheritance)" a few months back: > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca+tgmozev0nryvw9cnb81xdojg4xtpjmkdif0zto-gdlcoc...@mail.gmail.com
Thanks a lot, that's the one I was searching for. And now that I confirm it, there's NO reply to Robert's mail. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
