On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Nico Williams <n...@cryptonector.com> > wrote: > >> I suspect most users, like me, just roll their eyes, grumble, and put up > >> with it rather than complain. It's a pain point, but tolerable enough > >> that no one bothers to demand a change. Now that it's been done though, > >> allow me to add my voice in favor of it! > > > +1 to all of that. My vote doesn't count much but it would be -1. Question: Will the patch be removed if and when Oracle decides to be compatible with the standard and forbids non-aliased derived tables? (I know it's a rather theoretical question. Unlikely that Oracle breaks backwards compatibility on that.) Pantelis Theodosiou
