On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 10:50:57AM +0530, Pavan Deolasee wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > And there are no bugs, right? :-) > > Yeah yeah absolutely nothing. Just like any other feature committed to > Postgres > so far ;-) > > I need to polish the chain conversion patch a bit and also add missing support > for redo, hash indexes etc. Support for hash indexes will need overloading of > ip_posid bits in the index tuple (since there are no free bits left in hash > tuples). I plan to work on that next and submit a fully functional patch, > hopefully before the commit-fest starts. > > (I have mentioned the idea of overloading ip_posid bits a few times now and > haven't heard any objection so far. Well, that could either mean that nobody > has read those emails seriously or there is general acceptance to that idea.. > I > am assuming latter :-))
Yes, I think it is the latter. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
