On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Amit Langote
<langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Thanks for taking a look. Hm, I think the second part seems to be
> needless duplication. So, I changed it to match using TailMatches2("FOR",
> "VALUES") and kept just one instance of it. The first part is matching
> and completing two different commands (ATTACH PARTITION partition_name and
> PARTITION OF parent_name), so that seems fine.
I agree. Committed this version.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
