On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> BTW ... can anyone explain to me the reason why we offer to complete >>> CREATE OBJECT with the names of existing objects of that kind? > >> Isn't that to facilitate commands appended after CREATE SCHEMA? Say >> table foo is in schema1, and creating it in schema2 gets easier with >> tab completion? > > Seems like pretty much of a stretch. I've never done anything like > that, have you?
Never, but that was the only reason I could think about. I recall reading something else on -hackers but I cannot put my finger on it, nor does a lookup at the archives help... Perhaps that's the one I just mentioned as well. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
