On 2/28/17 08:57, Magnus Hagander wrote: > It appears we need pandoc 1.13 to get the good output. This won't be > available until Debian stretch. > > So for PG10, I propose the attached revised patch which keeps using lynx > but uses xsltproc instead of jade. > > > It is available for people not using debian though? Might it be > worthwhile to make it dependent on the version of pandoc -- so use that > method if people have the newer pandoc and fall back to lynx if they don't?
Well, this really only runs once every couple of months on borka and here or there for those building their own snapshot tarballs. I don't think we need to cater to a wide audience here. In fact, variety could be bad here: We don't want to find out that a tarball was rolled with the wrong variant. The pandoc change can be revisited independently. The main point right now is to get away from the DSSSL toolchain. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
