On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think for now we can keep the parallel safety check for cheapest >> inner path, though it will be of use only for the very first time we >> compare the paths in that loop. I am not sure if there is any other >> better way to handle the same. > > Done that way. >
Thanks, your patch looks good to me. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
