On 2/28/17 20:01, Lukas Fittl wrote:
> Currently pg_stat_statements replaces constant values with ? characters.
> I've seen this be a problem on multiple occasions, in particular since
> it conflicts with the use of ? as an operator.
> 
> I'd like to propose changing the replacement character from ? to instead
> be a parameter (like $1).

Hmm, I think this could confuse people into thinking that the queries
displayed were in fact prepared queries.

Maybe we could gather some more ideas.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to