On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Because there are already various tools available to log activity of >> session processes, but there are no other ways to log the activity of >> autovacuum. Why are the existing settings not sufficient for this >> purpose? > > I've pretty often been annoyed that the information provided by 'VACUUM > VERBOSE' and the information provided by log_autovacuum_min_duration are so > drastically different from each other. It would be pretty nice to have some > way to get the same information for both operations in the same format, > although I don't know if this proposal is the best way of accomplishing it.
Well said! I actually quite agree with the goal of making it possible to get that reporting for manual VACUUMs. I just disagree with the idea of tying it into this particular GUC. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
