On 3/1/17 9:24 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 3/1/17 09:51, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 2/22/17 19:35, Jim Nasby wrote:
pg_get_object_address() currently returns a field called subobjid, while
pg_depend calls that objsubid. I'm guessing that wasn't on purpose
(especially because internally the function uses objsubid), and it'd be
nice to fix it.
I'm in favor of changing it, but it could theoretically break someone's
code.
Yes, it was an oversight. +1 for changing.
OK done.
BTW, did you backpatch as well? The function was added in 9.5.
Presumably we wouldn't normally do that, but if we think this is unused
enough maybe it's worth it.
--
Jim Nasby, Chief Data Architect, OpenSCG
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
