On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:02 AM, David Rowley
<david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 7 March 2017 at 15:21, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1.  How about changing the description of
>> max_parallel_workers_per_gather to "taken from max_worker_processes,
>> limited by max_parallel_workers"?
>
> Thanks for looking.
>
> Seems more accurate to say that it's "taken from
> max_parallel_workers", maybe.
>

I thought of saying similar to what we have in docs, however the way
you have written works for me.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to