On 2017/03/08 1:34, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Amit Langote wrote: >> On 2017/03/07 14:04, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Therefore, there should definitely be a partitioned table, hopefully with >>> a less generic name than "p1", in the final regression DB state. Whether >>> this particular one from alter_table.sql is a good candidate, I dunno. >>> But let's not drop it without adding a better-thought-out replacement. >> >> OK, let's drop p1 in alter_table.sql. I think a partitioned table created >> in insert.sql is a good candidate to keep around after having it renamed, >> which patch 0003 does. > > Committed 0001. > > Committed 0002 and 0003 together.
Thanks. Regards, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
