Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Sean Chittenden writes: > > > Keep krb4 in the tree for 7.4, but before 7.4 gets released, the > > documentation and release notes need to state that krb4 has been > > depreciated and that it will be removed before 7.5. I'll add submit a > > patch for the updated verbiage in a bit. -sc > > I object to treating foreign software packages like that. Those who are > interested in Kerberos 4 or even managed to obtain software for it are > intelligent enough to be able to make judgements about it. Kerberos 4 is > nowhere near the likely-to-be-chosen path in PostgreSQL, so there's > nothing we need to be scared about.
True, but it does bloat our distribution. I had to work around its need for gethostname() while I was coding the Win32 port, so it doesn't stay around with zero maintance. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
