On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > Personally that's not addressing my main concern, which is that the > latency of getting done with some patch/topic takes a long while. If I > have to wait for the buildfarm to check some preliminary patch, I still > have to afterwards work on pushing it to master. And very likely my > local check would finish a lot faster than a bunch of buildfarm animals > - I have after all a plenty powerfull machine, lots of cores, fast ssd, > lots of memory, ... > > So I really want faster end-to-end test, not less cpu time spent on my > own machine.
Yeah. I think the buildfarm-for-test-commits or maybe buildfarm-for-approved-branches-belonging-to-people-we-basically-trust idea isn't a bad one, but it's not a substitute for $SUBJECT. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
