Tom, all, * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> If you don't want to make ExecInitExpr responsible, then the planner would > >> have to do something like split_pathtarget_at_srf anyway to decompose the > >> expressions, no matter which executor representation we use. > > > Did we do anything about this? Are we going to? > > No, and I think we should. Is it on the v10 open items list?
Wasn't, I've added it now: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_10_Open_Items Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
