On 3/9/17 18:39, Kevin Grittner wrote: > With the addition of transition tables we have all four, although > I'm not sure whether the CREATE TRIGGER statement conforms closely > enough to claim the feature. The two basic issues I can think of > are: > - we don't allow the OLD and NEW transition variable names to be > specified -- using hard-coded values instead > - we don't support the standard <triggered SQL statement> formats, > instead supporting only our EXECUTE PROCEDURE syntax > > Do we leave T211, "Basic trigger capability" on our "unsupported" > list until those two points are addressed?
Those seem pretty big ones. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
