On 2017-03-13 14:09:39 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > On 2017-03-13 15:45:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > I could be wrong, but the most obvious explanation for this failure is > > that autovacuum had a lock on the table or index when we looked. > > Even if that isn't why axolotl failed in this particular case, I think > > it's dead certain that we will see such failures from time to time > > if this test script isn't tightened up. IIUC what the test is trying > > to look for, I think adding "AND pid = pg_backend_pid()" to this query > > would be an appropriate fix. > > Yes, that sounds reasonable. Will do in a bit. Thanks for noticing.
Pushed. - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
