Andrew Dunstan <andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I have confirmed on jacana Petr's observation that adding a timeout to
> the WaitLatchOrSocket cures the problem.
Does anyone have a theory as to why that cures the problem?
What length of timeout is being suggested here? Would a long timeout
perhaps create a performance issue? That is, I'm wondering if the
wait actually sleeps to the end of the timeout in the problem case(s).
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
