if (buf->usage_count < BM_MAX_USAGE_COUNT) if (BUF_STATE_GET_USAGECOUNT(buf_state) != BM_MAX_USAGE_COUNT)being prone to paranoia, I prefer the first, but I've seen both styles in the code so I don't know if it's worth futzing with. Ok, let's be paranoic and do this same way as before. Revised patch is attached.
I see the change was done in 9.6 release cycle in commit 48354581a49c30f5757c203415aa8412d85b0f70 at April, 10. Does it mean the fix should be backpatched too?
-- Teodor Sigaev E-mail: [email protected] WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
